Sök
Senaste inläggen
Arkiv
Kategorier
Taggmoln
Bourgeoisie lackeys like Aqurette
Aqurette.com: Bourgeois Pigs: “The Swedish Social Democratic Party has bought the domain name “borgarsvin.se”, Björn Pedersen reports. “Borgarsvin” is a pejorative word and an insulting epithet often used by hardcore communists. It derives from the term Bourgeoisie, which is synonymous with “middle class” and found in the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.”
(Found by knuff.se.)
It is interesting to see that the bourgeois lackeys now round up to attack the so far not confirmed social democratic registration of the domain borgarsvin.se. So far we only know that the domain points to the IP-address of the social democratic party and that the owner of the domain is Thomas Söderlund (who is so far unknown).
As you of course would expect these lackeys don´t no a thing about marxism. They cant even read! Agurette thinks bourgeois is middle class. From Wikipedia (captured on Februari 29th 2008) I give you a pretty good piece about the marxist view:
One of the most influential of the aforementioned criticisms came from Karl Marx, who attacked bourgeois political theory and its view of civil society and culture for believing these concepts and institutions to be universally true; in Marx’s view, these concepts were only the ideology of the bourgeoisie as a new ruling class, which sought to reshape society after its own image.[citation needed]
Marxism defines the bourgeoisie as the social class which obtains income from ownership or trade in capital assets, or from commercial activities such as the buying and selling of commodities, wares, and services. In medieval times, the bourgeois was typically a self-employed proprietor, small employer, entrepreneur, banker, or merchant. In industrial capitalism, on the other hand, the bourgeoisie becomes the ruling class – which means it also owns the bulk of the means of production (land, factories, offices, capital, resources) as well as the means of coercion (national armed forces, prison systems, court systems). Ownership of the means of production enables it to employ and exploit the work of a large mass of wage workers (the working class), also known as the industrial middle class, who have no other means of livelihood than to sell their labour to property owners; while control over the means of coercion allows intervention during challenges from below.[1]
By the way, of course it happens that social democrats in Sweden sometimes play a little dirty – it´s sort of comes with the game. For anyone interested it could perhaps be a good idea to study the bourgeoise lackeys campaigns against social democratic party leaders especially from Olof Palme and onwards. You know – from pretty innocent remarks to celebrating the anniversary of the murder of Olof Palme.
C. L. K. Aqurette skriver: If you look up the word ”bourgeois” in any dictionary, you’ll find that it refers to the middle class. In fact, Marx’s own definition of the term states that anyone who is not bound to sell his or her physical labour is part of the bourgeoisie. Proletarians (working-class people), in Marxist terminology, are those with no possessions besides their bodies. Thus, the middle class is the bourgeoisie.
That was the definition during the medieval times, as you perhaps know we have moved along (perhaps not to your liking). During the transition to the industrial age the bourgeoisie moved up and became the ruling class – defined as the ones owning the means of production.
Now – my main point was that you are trying to spread a picture of the social democratic party which is simply not true. As that is another example of the ”bourgeoisie lackeys” dirty campaign I found it amusing to continue to use the ”old marxist” term which as you know is very rarely used whithin the social democrats of today.
Senaste kommentarerna